BuzzMachine » Blog Archive » NewsTrust 
BuzzMachine » Blog Archive » NewsTrust 
Portnoy:釋放胡佳! 收藏於 2007/01/02
And so NewsTrust set about having us rate stories and sources. When I first heard about their effort, I liked the idea but also cautioned that the self-selecting nature of having anyone rate whatever they want would skew the value of the results; it will amplify agendas as one person comes in to praise those with whom he agrees and the next comes in to blast those with whom she disagrees. Fabrice and Rory worked to fix that by having juries of judges — for example, classes of journalism students — judge articles assigned to them. But it’s still the case that anyone can rate anything.
群組:媒體觀察站

想發現更多精彩書籤?
其他更多討論
發言評價:1

Leonard╳地球男孩 (romleonard) 1868 天前說...
嗯嗯...這篇文章討論的話題很有趣...
我唯一有點意見(雞蛋裡挑骨頭)的是portnoy先生的標籤...
"mewstrust"? portnoy你打錯字了嗎?
(逃....)
發言評價:1451
發言評價:1
1

Leonard╳地球男孩 (romleonard) 1868 天前說...
Jeff Jarvis討論的ratings和judging在NewsTrust造成偏差情況,
好像跟先前hemidemi一度非常"熱鬧"的熱門書籤討論有異曲同工之妙,(前一陣子看到頭很昏)
不過Jarvis也承認很難有解決方式,我好像只看到兩個方案:
一,多多摘或推訊息.
二,只當NewsTrust是推薦功能,兩造並陳後容讀者自行判斷.
Jarvis覺得使用人數與時間增加後情況會改變,意思是我們還要等著看...
不好意思...我也不會有什麼insight..
頂多只能做一下summary :P
發言評價:1451

Portnoy:釋放胡佳! (portnoy) 1868 天前說...
稍微有點不一樣,因為之前黑米的討論還牽扯到各類書籤討論相互干擾的問題、自推文章的問題,而Newstrust定位很清楚,就是只從主流媒體硬性新聞中來挑選可信的消息來源。而在介面跟評分模式上,Newstrust也跟黑米不同,所以的確是異曲同工。
發言評價:1
廣告:

5


標籤:










訂閱
看看大家怎麼說