學術瘴氣

收集以社會科學（社會學、政治學、地理學、政治經濟學）為主的研究文章、研究心得、深入分析、研討會訊息，當然，還有研究生的甘苦抱怨談。

507 天前

4人

ACP - Process of Peer-Review, Publication & Interactive Discussion

小收藏於 2007/05/23

引述 :『The process of peer-review and publication in the interactive scientific journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP) differs from traditional scientific journals. It is a two-stage process involving the scientific discussion forum Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions (ACPD), and it has been designed to use the full potential of the internet to foster scientific discussion and enable rapid publication of scientific papers. Initial access peer-review assures the basic scientific and technical quality for papers published in ACPD. Subsequent interactive discussion and public commenting by the referees, authors and other members of the scientific community is expected to enhance quality control for papers published in ACP beyond the limits of the traditional closed peer-review. Also in cases where no additional comments from the scientific community are received, a full peer-review process in the traditional sense, but in a more transparent way, is assured before publication of a paper in ACP.』

from http://www.copernicus.org/E...

Journal Atmospheric Chenistry and Physics (ACP)期刊的兩階段線上互動peer-reivew及討論的方式介紹 Journal Atmospheric Chenistry and Physics (ACP)期刊是只在線上發行，強調open acess的期刊繼續閱讀...

標籤：情報科技學術 online open

Twitter

看看大家怎麼說

發言評價：137

Ivan (pinc) 507 天前收藏

Journal Atmospheric Chenistry and Physics (ACP)期刊的兩階段線上互動peer-reivew及討論的方式介紹
Journal Atmospheric Chenistry and Physics (ACP)期刊是只在線上發行，強調open acess的期刊

想發現更多精彩書籤？

其他更多討論

發言評價：2

Wow, this is interesting! If only in the future the discussion would open to all the people. I mean, lay people participate in the production of 'hard knowledge', too. Academics need to collide with the real world. After all, knowledge has to be translated to applicable to better the world, doesn't it.

留言小技巧

看看群組之外，總共多少人收藏