學術瘴氣

收集以社會科學(社會學、政治學、地理學、政治經濟學)為主的研究文章、研究心得、深入分析、研討會訊息,當然,還有研究生的甘苦抱怨談。
小提示: 要快速找到需要的書籤嗎?點左側分類,畫面會先出現該分類下相關的標籤雲。再點標籤之後,即會幫你精準找到「分類」+「標籤」交集過後的書籤。也可以用下方功能列中之收推、討論或熱門等方式加以排序喔
瀏覽模式
書籤標題
收藏時間
408117

立達 收藏於 2007/01/17

No doubt, Wikipedia's anyone-can-be-an-expert nature means that it, too, can get things wrong. The site also gets its share of pranksters. Recent entries have noted that a popular computer game was written by Mr. T, of television's "The A-Team" (not), and that one of the prime suspects in the assassination of John F. Kennedy was John Seigenthaler, Sr., the founding editorial director of USA Today (beyond not). The key to using Wikipedia, say its supporters, is understanding Wikipedia: It's a jumping-off point for research, a place where users get background on a topic, and links to authoritative sources. It is not, on its own, a definitive source. Even Wikipedia's founder, Jimmy "Jimbo" Wales, has advised college students not to use the site for serious research. In comments made to BusinessWeek in September, patent commissioner John Doll said that Wikipedia had been used for background only, and not as a basis for accepting or rejecting applications.

美國專利商標局規定Wiki只能背景參考,不能作為專利核駁的依據。Wiki創始者Jimmy "Jimbo" Wales也如此建議使用者。

完整
2007/01/17