你想知道你的未來嗎？
很簡單...看看你目前工作這行業中做5年的人
看看他現在的生活模式你是否滿意
那就是自己未來5年後的結果
如果你需要獲得幫助或改善，這個機會將帶給你希望和全新的感受
此片DVD影音 將為您說明一切 http://www.luckygoodwork.ws/
祝福你！！
你想知道你的未來嗎？
很簡單...看看你目前工作這行業中做5年的人
看看他現在的生活模式你是否滿意
那就是自己未來5年後的結果
如果你需要獲得幫助或改善，這個機會將帶給你希望和全新的感受
此片DVD影音 將為您說明一切 http://www.luckygoodwork.ws/
祝福你！！
你想知道你的未來嗎？
很簡單...看看你目前工作這行業中做5年的人
看看他現在的生活模式你是否滿意
那就是自己未來5年後的結果
如果你需要獲得幫助或改善，這個機會將帶給你希望和全新的感受
此片DVD影音 將為您說明一切 http://www.luckygoodwork.ws/
祝福你！！
很用心認真的部落格～記得回踩噢~呵呵 留下腳印
www.luckygoodwork.ws
http://blog.sina.com.tw/luckygoodwork/
不改變就永遠不變,
最簡單最有潛力的持續收入計畫
免費索取資訊> http://www.luckygoodwork.ws/
如有打擾請略過～謝謝！
雖然大環境還處在復甦階段，但是台灣網路購物市場的前景仍相當看好，甚至比去年更為成長。根據資策會產業情報研究所(MIC)所做的「2009年台灣線上購物市場現況」調查顯示，今年整體台灣網路購物市場比去年成長了30.4%，預估市場規模可達3116億，其中又以C2C的市場規模成長幅度最大。
在C2C網路購物部分，由於越來越多個人或中小企業的商家藉由在拍賣網站開店直接與消費者接觸來販賣商品，這部分的較去年約成長35.2%；而多為中大型企業所設置的B2C電子商店市場規模也有所成長，約比去年成長26.5%。資策會發現，C2C與B2C兩者的市場規模比例差距已愈來愈小。
另外，台灣的電子商店業者已有6成都有計畫往中國大陸擴展市場，其次為日本、美國及歐洲。不過目前已正式開始經營跨國、跨區域的電子商店大約只有不到2成，根據資策會MIC的調查結果發現，未來2年內有近3成的電子商店將展開跨國經營的計畫。
不過，跨國經營電子商店仍有風險與挑戰，在資策會MIC的研究調查中發現，多數業者認為「物流控管」以及「金流服務」將是最大的考驗與挑戰。
至於，在B2C電子商店所經營的商品類型裡，前三名為「旅遊產品」、「服飾精品」、「資訊電子」。這三類商品就占了整體台灣網路購物市場規模的71.6%。第四名為「美容保健」、第五名為「票務」、第六名為「書籍雜誌」。
資策會MIC資深產業分析師劉楚慧表示，預估台灣B2C網路購物市場規模，「服飾精品」將首度超越「資訊電子」。這也表示，在「服飾精品」類的業者競爭相當激烈，進入與退出的業者都相當多，要在這類商品贏得網友買單而勝出的業者，除了要讓產品具有優良的品外，質可能需要更加強未來的售後服務、信用與安全交易。
資策會MIC：2009年台灣網購市場規模達3億多 服飾精品類競爭激烈-Yahoo!奇摩新聞2009/07/14
http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/090714/35/1n1po.html
我找不到重灌狂人說明ijiggg中第一步驟中的加入會員圖面~~~ijiggg首頁是否更新過~~全部英文看不懂
相關資料
http://lis.ly.gov.tw/lgcgi/lgmeetimage?cfc8cfcdcfcbc8cdc5cdcdccd2cdccc7
原文：STUDY FINDS LINK BETWEEN FACEBOOK USE, LOWER GRADES IN COLLEGE
http://researchnews.osu.edu/archive/facebookusers.htm
SAN DIEGO – College students who use Facebook spend less time studying and have lower grade point averages than students who have not signed up for the social networking website, according to a pilot study at one university.
However, more than three-quarters of Facebook users claimed that their use of the social networking site didn’t interfere with their studies.
“We can’t say that use of Facebook leads to lower grades and less studying – but we did find a relationship there,” said Aryn Karpinski, co-author of the study and a doctoral student in education at Ohio State University.
“There’s a disconnect between students’ claim that Facebook use doesn’t impact their studies, and our finding showing they had lower grades and spent less time studying.”
While this was a relatively small, exploratory study, it is one of the first to find a relationship between college students’ use of Facebook and their academic achievement.
Typically, Facebook users in the study had GPAs between 3.0 and 3.5, while non-users had GPAs between 3.5 and 4.0.
In addition, users said they averaged one to five hours a week studying, while non-users studied 11 to 15 hours per week.
Karpinski conducted the study with Adam Duberstein of Ohio Dominican University. They presented their research April 16 in San Diego at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association.
The researchers surveyed 219 students at Ohio State, including 102 undergraduate students and 117 graduate students. Of the participants, 148 said they had a Facebook account.
The study found that 85 percent of undergraduates were Facebook users, while only 52 percent of graduate students had accounts.
Students who spent more time working at paid jobs were less likely to use Facebook, while students who were more involved in extracurricular activities at school were more likely to use Facebook.
Science, technology, engineering, math (STEM) and business majors were more likely to use Facebook than were students majoring in the humanities and social sciences.
“Other research had indicated that STEM majors spend more time on the Internet than do other students, so that may be one reason why they are more likely to use Facebook,” Karpinski said.
There were no differences in Facebook use between different members of racial and ethnic groups that were part of the study, or between men and women.
Younger and full-time students were more likely to be Facebook users.
Findings showed that 79 percent of Facebook users claimed it did not have an impact on their academic performance. In open-ended questions on the survey, users claimed they didn’t use Facebook frequently enough to notice an impact, and emphasized that academics were a priority for them.
Karpinski emphasized that the results don’t necessarily mean that Facebook use leads to lower grades.
“There may be other factors involved, such as personality traits, that link Facebook use and lower grades,” she said.
“It may be that if it wasn’t for Facebook, some students would still find other ways to avoid studying, and would still get lower grades. But perhaps the lower GPAs could actually be because students are spending too much time socializing online.”
Karpinski said it was significant that the link between lower grades and Facebook use was found even in graduate students. She said that graduate students generally have GPAs above 3.5, so the fact that even they had lower grades when they used Facebook -- and spent less time studying – was an amazing finding.
The popularity of Facebook is evident in college lecture halls, Karpinski said. Faculty members who allow students to use laptops in class have told her they often see students on the Facebook site during class.
“It’s not going away anytime soon, and we need to learn more about how Facebook use is affecting students,” she said.
As for herself, Karpinski said she doesn’t have a Facebook account, although her co-author does.
“For me, I think Facebook is a huge distraction,” she said.
哈哈，太瞎了
有玩FB 沒玩FB
唸書時間 1小時到5小時 11到15小時
成績 3.0到3.5 3.5至4.0
光看這個報告的結果
愛玩的當然繼續玩啊
我花二分之ㄧ至三分之ㄧ的時間就可以維持中等成績
何樂不為？
這則編譯新聞標題取的這麼聳動
裡面說的卻不是那回事
原文肯定並沒有說完FB成績變差
另一家取的標題就中肯多了
研究：玩Facebook的大學生平均成績較差
網路就是這樣各抒己見，
只不過擁有發言權的名人們擁有左右輿論的力量，
一個juicy的標題或許可以吸引更多人點閱，
但＂力量越大 責任越大＂，
這句話應該也是下筆時需要考量的吧(茶)
得罪人的話還請多包涵！
我只是將眾多可能性之一提出來討論而已，畢竟什麼樣的產品都有人支持，都有人不喜歡。
純粹就是看使用者自己有沒有達成自己要的目標而已！
Re: B2B的社交網站：LinkedIn
焌懿(JACKY) 說:
越來越多的SOHO族 ﹝Small office home office﹞掘起，
因為資訊結構的改變，讓他們越來越符合專業與自我負責的時代需要！
SOHO將是一股無法阻擋的時代潮流，
如果你不跟著時代潮流就可能會被淹沒，
因為會願意為你一生負責的公司，
已經越來越少只有你自己可以為自己負責。
你必須為自己賺錢，為別人賺錢永遠無法致富
採取行動，大膽一博的人，有時成功有時失敗。
但是什麼都不做的人，註定失敗。
全球趨勢大師梭羅說：
「全球化時代，知識是成功的關鍵，勇敢是成功的心態。」
保羅傑帝（J.Paul Getty）的”如何致富（How to get rich）”
書中提到的第一個致富之道：
「你必須為自己賺錢，為別人賺錢你永遠無法致富。」
建構屬於自己的vemma維瑪網路事業，
給自己帶來不一樣的美好嶄新的錢景！
學習實踐富爸爸的創業精神，
現在真的正在是時候!
親自免費試用VEMMA在家工作系統90天！
http://asasx51.blogspot.com/
★PS:謝謝您的閱讀。如果您不感興趣，很抱歉打擾您!!請將此文刪除，祝版主事事順心。